Lan Mi vs Anna Kmiecik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 16 Oct at 09:59 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

L. Mi vs A. Kmiecik

Lan Mi
Lan Mi

Flag CHN CHN

w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
Anna Kmiecik
Anna Kmiecik

Flag POL POL

w
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

21
Age
17
-
Height
-
786
C. Rank
0
776
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Mi 1 - 0 Kmiecik

They have played 2 sets in total, with Lan Mi winning 2 and Anna Kmiecik winning 0. The last match between Lan Mi and Anna Kmiecik was at the W15 Monastir, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Lan Mi getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Mi1
Kmiecik0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2W15 Monastir(10-16-25)

Hard
CHN Flag
Lan Mi
6
6
POL Flag
Anna Kmiecik
4
3

L. Mi vs A. Kmiecik H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
57.58% (38-28)Career Total W/L45.83% (11-13)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

L. Mi vs A. Kmiecik Match Preview:

  • In recent form, Lan Mi slightly edges out Anna Kmiecik in second serve performance, winning 36.16% of points compared to Anna's 35.10%. Could this marginal difference prove decisive?
  • Returning stats favor Lan Mi, as she wins 52.60% of second serve return points, surpassing Anna's 50.00%. First serve return points show a close contest, with Anna leading by a small margin at 39.95% against Lan's 38.91%.
  • Under pressure, Lan Mi demonstrates resilience, saving 44.84% of breakpoints compared to Anna Kmiecik's 38.24%. How might this impact critical moments in the match?
  • Over the past year, Lan Mi has won 52.94% of her matches (18/16), slightly ahead of Anna Kmiecik's 50.00% (8/8), suggesting a consistent edge in match outcomes.
  • Specializing on different surfaces, both players achieve their best results on their respective preferred surfaces. Lan excels on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, while Anna performs best on Clay with the same win percentage.
  • When analyzing opponent quality, Lan Mi has faced players with an average rank of 349.47, whereas Anna has competed against more highly ranked opponents, averaging 181. Could this difference in competition level play a role in the outcome?
  • If this match extends to a deciding set, Anna Kmiecik holds a slight advantage, winning 50% of such sets in the past 12 months, compared to Lan Mi's 38% success rate in these critical situations.

Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):

Lan Mi has demonstrated a slight edge over Anna Kmiecik in recent performance metrics, including second serve success and breakpoint resilience. While Anna Kmiecik faces tougher competition, Lan Mi's ability to perform under pressure could be pivotal in close moments.

With both players favoring different surfaces, the match conditions could also be a deciding factor, likely benefitting Lan Mi if played on Hard courts. However, Anna Kmiecik's impressive deciding set record offers her an advantage should the match reach its climax.

Overall, with Lan Mi's consistent recent performances and superior breakpoint stats, she seems to have a narrow advantage in this upcoming encounter. Expect a competitive match, but Lan Mi might just have the edge to secure victory.

Lan Mi vs Anna Kmiecik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Mi vs A. Kmiecik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won7
1Total Double Faults3
1:46:35Average Match Time1:46:35
87% (47/54)1st Serve %72% (56/78)
47% (22/47)1st Serve Win %45% (25/56)
43% (3/7)2nd Serve Win %36% (8/22)
62% (8/13)Break Pts Won %71% (5/7)
58% (45/78)Return Points Win %54% (29/54)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Mi 42%, Kmiecik 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mi 58%, Kmiecik 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Mi 43%, Kmiecik 44%.

L. Mi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW15 Sharm ElSheikh - 24-11-2025

QF

FRAA. Reguer
L
6-2 6-0

R2

KORO. Yu
W
6-4 6-1

R1

CHNY. Shan
W
6-2 6-4
HardW15 Sharm ElSheikh - 17-11-2025

R1

SUIK. Paul
L
6-2 6-1
ClayW35 Orlando - 03-11-2025

R1

USAL. Chang
L
6-0 5-7 6-2

A. Kmiecik Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardW50 Trnava - 17-11-2025

Q1

ESTE. Malygina
L
7-6(0) 6-1
HardW15 Monastir - 13-10-2025

R2

CHNL. Mi
L
6-4 6-3

R1

JPNR. Kikawada
W
6-2 6-2
HardW15 Monastir - 06-10-2025

R1

POLI. Wawrzkiewicz
L
6-3 6-1
ClayW15 Radom - 08-09-2025

R2

BELV. Van
L
7-5 6-1
banner

L. Mi vs A. Kmiecik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
57.58% (38/28)YTD Win/Loss45.83% (11/13)
57.43% (85/63)Sets Win/Loss45.28% (24/29)
53.26% (694/609)Games Win/Loss48.00% (240/260)
60.66% (37/24)Hard Win/Loss25.00% (1/3)
25.00% (1/3)Clay Win/Loss55.56% (10/8)
0.00% (0/1)Indoor Hard W/L0.00% (0/2)
0Aces Per Game0.02
2Aces Total4
0.09Double Faults Per Game0.17
54Total Double Faults41
1:38:1Average Match Time1:11:13
364.21Average Opponent Rank239.79
83% (3091/3709)1st Serve %75% (826/1101)
52% (1602/3091)1st Serve Win %50% (412/826)
44% (275/618)2nd Serve Win %43% (118/275)
49% (267/548)Break Points Won % (Total)52% (72/139)
49% (1921/3926)Return Points Win %48% (512/1065)
53.13% (17/15)Challenger W/L54.55% (6/5)
61.76% (21/13)Futures W/L38.46% (5/8)
57% (37/65)Best of 3 Sets Win %46% (11/24)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
42% (5/12)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)29% (2/7)
40% (6/15)Deciding Set Win %60% (3/5)
89% (38/34)1st Set Won, Won Match82% (11/9)
11% (38/4)1st Set Won, Lost Match18% (11/2)
14% (28/4)1st Set Lost, Won Match15% (13/2)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Fri, 28 Nov, 08:00 PM
Prediction
BOLJ. C. P. Angelo5
USAM. Kuharq
W1
1.21
W2
3.84
Fri, 28 Nov, 09:30 PM
Prediction
ARGL. Midon7
ARGJ. M. L. Serna
W1
1.363
W2
2.83
Fri, 28 Nov, 09:30 PM
Prediction
BRAH. O. Nogueiraq
BOLS. LoraWC
W1
2.93
W2
1.34
Sat, 29 Nov, 06:00 AM
Prediction
KORG. J. Kim
USAT. Dean
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Sat, 29 Nov, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDS. D. P. Dev1
INDN. K. Sinha8
W1
1.115
W2
5.25
Fri, 28 Nov, 08:00 PM
Prediction
BOLD. E. M. Naviaq
BRAJ. V. S. D. Lago8
W1
2.06
W2
1.66